Why I Am Appealing Placing This Statue in the Circle


By Janet Gervers

Windward Circle is the HEART of Venice. The Greater Venice Community needs to be included in important decisions related to our Neighborhood – and part of the overall process.


This is in addition to developing a process for placing public art in Venice. The voices of Venetians have largely been ignored and excluded in regard to the Coastal Development Permit granted for a public project installation of a Robert Graham sculpture, “Torso,” on the Venice Traffic Circle median referred to as Windward Circle in this letter.

At the public hearing on March 17, the architect of the project stated that a number of meetings had been held in the past year regarding this matter. However, these meeting were for groups with privately-held memberships, not for the Greater Venice Neighborhood, nor advertised to the greater Venice neighborhood.
As a resident, business owner, and active member of the community (President, Venice Art Collective; Member, Venice Art Council) located directly off of Windward Circle, I never received a flyer or any other kind of notice for these meetings nor did the majority of our neighborhood.

Essentially, a small exclusive group in Venice has been privvy to the information regarding Windward Circle. It should be noted that our own Venice Chamber of Commerce was not included in these exclusive presentations.

Does this adequately represent the voice of the Venice community? Simply put- NO!

In addition, the proposed art does not reflect the Venice Community in any way. Public art in the center of the community needs to have the visual connection that goes beyond artist name recognition – plus something that leaves a lasting legacy that the community is proud of in future generations.

Leaders of various community groups must be contacted to spread the word about projects impacting our community. In light of an art related project, with Venice as a reknowned art center – and with so many art groups this is the first place to turn to in establishing an inclusive dialogue within our community.

These are my recommendations in regard to the permit for the Graham sculpture and ANY public art to be placed in the Venice Neighborhood:

DENY the Permit for reasons stated above. However, a conditional permit could be approved based on these parameters:

A. Community Guidelines and Process established for Public Art in Venice by a panel of representatives from a cross-section of leaders from Venice Art Groups. A group can easily be formed by the month of May for this purpose- with an Open Call to Artists to submit works of art. (Guidelines can be based on existing guidelines such as the cities of West Hollywood and Culver City, respectively - no need to reinvent the wheel.)

B. Public works of art, especially in the heart of our community must be visually reflective of the Venice community and must go beyond an artist living in Venice.

C. If Graham chooses to create a new piece that follows the above, then the permit may be granted - conditional as stated. Note the sculpture is not cast yet. Also note that this closely resembles his art in Beverly Hills and is very representative of that community. In no way does it represent the community of Venice and is very derivative of the said Beverly Hills sculpture. Venice is a unique community and deserves unique works of art that reflect our community.

It is critical that the establishment of Community Guidelines/Process by leaders and members of Venice art groups takes place for any public art or project in Venice.

In addition, our public tax dollars need to be effectively appropriated for community projects with objectives voiced by our community.

The small, exclusive group that currently sponsors this project is not aligned with the objectives of the Greater Venice Community. It is inappropriate to allow them to determine how our tax dollars are spent!

Posted: Fri - April 1, 2005 at 07:34 PM          


©