Most Still Don’t Recall


By Gonzalo Santos

The gubernatorial recall election just held in California is in many ways a textbook example of the "social construction of reality," among other things sociology teaches us.


Entire forests were felled to print stories that attributed the whole thing to a "voter revolt," from the very beginning but especially after the results were in. But, it turns out that only one in five eligible voters in California voted for the recall; and, by the way, only one in six chose "The Governator." The rest of the "eligibles," an overwhelming majority, either voted against the recall or didn't bother to vote (see table & graph below). Millions more - the "ineligibles" - just watched, if at all. Altogether, only one in ten California residents voted to recall the governor.

Some "revolt."

Still, most people today harbor the false impression that a huge popular rebellion decisively dumped Davis and chose Schwarzenegger, whether they supported that or not. What is fascinating is how all the actors involved - the media, the state agencies in charge of elections, the political parties, and the candidates - embraced this myth for quite different reasons.

Apart from those who actually won (republicans, the no-tax populists, the usual business cronies, etc.), many anti-recall folks hoped to reduce the potential for political chaos by immediately containing and giving finality to an event that clearly threatened the traditional rules of the game; others turned quickly to celebrate a supposedly revitalized democracy (and with a Hollywood celebrity, no less!) to bring back some luster and legitimacy into California - even national - politics.

Many others who are aware of the difficulties ahead sought to placate or channel palpable popular discontent via flattery of the electorate and now make solemn vows that they will heed the new mighty popular "mandate;" they hope in this way to enhance governability and gain political cover from those millions of working class families that will suffer the most from the draconian social cut-backs soon to be passed with little dissent in the name of newly-found fiscal discipline; others are desperate enough and willing enough to buy anything at this dismal point in state politics that promises to "fix Sacramento" and yield positive economic results. Etc., etc., etc..

All understandable, even worthy reasons, to be sure; worthy enough to make the mass rebellion fantasy be proclaimed as "real" by our political/media elites and the rest of us to uncritically accept it as such. It is our collective whistling in the dark.

The real rebellion against, and indictment of, today's California/U.S. political system, though, lie silently - even subconciously - in the persistent, steadily rising abstentionist (boycott) rates that reduce these sort of events - even the Bush-Gore debacle in 2000 - to essentially fixed (as in pre-arranged and staged) tempests in a broken teapot. A made-for-TV movie. The California recall smacks now, after so many supposedly populist propositions (equally pre-manufactured) Californians have gone through in the last 3 decades since Prop. 13, as "The Perfect Storm, Part IX: The Terminator Meets ToastMan."

Though these fictive pseudo mass events are very real in their consequences, and are meant to be entertaining and soothing to many, there is an eerie lack of Establishment connect with (and concern for) the absence of well over half of the domestic population - by far the most hurt and upset - in the political process; save, you guessed it, a few movies that still entertain us more than mobilize us, like Warren Beatty's 1998 "Bullworth." This is consistent with the blasé ways the U.S. elites seems to be discounting world opinion these days. They do so, on both counts, largely indulging in self-serving fantasies that many more of us end up embracing at our peril. Some social constructions, after all, do collapse.

Stay tuned for the 2004 presidential (or gubernatorial) election results, brought to you by -- we interrupt this program to inform you that in Iraq (or East L.A.) just minutes ago ...

Gonzalo Santos is a professor of Sociology at Cal State, Bakersfield, and a frequent visitor to Venice.

Posted: Sat - November 1, 2003 at 04:58 PM          


©